“ The Second Amendment permits reasonable restrictions on the right to carry a firearm. This is the wrong answer,” House Speaker Adrienne Jones (D-Baltimore County) and Senate President Bill Ferguson (D-Baltimore City) said in a joint statement. “More guns in public means more violence, and more violence means more death and heartache everywhere. “There are different standards that they can put into it, but it will be far easier to get a gun going forward.”ĭemocratic leaders who control the General Assembly said they “fundamentally disagree” with the high court’s decision and would examine their options before deciding how to respond. “It’s not the ‘Wild West’ in the sense that anybody can have one,” he said. Gansler said Maryland lawmakers will likely be able to place certain restrictions on who can own a weapon, including a prior criminal record, mental health issues or domestic violence allegations. Once a challenge is filed, “the circuit court where will initially be held, in some county, will rely on this Supreme Court case, and it will be overturned,” he predicted. In an interview, former Maryland Attorney General Doug Gansler (D) said it’s only a matter of time before Maryland’s current gun laws are overturned.Ī candidate for governor, Gansler said the New York law that just got struck down relies on different phrasing than Maryland’s, but they’re essentially identical. Additional information and guidance will be forthcoming.” The Maryland State Police, which may need to change the way gun licenses are issued, released a terse statement said the Supreme Court decision is “under legal review. “The Supreme Court’s common sense ruling shows that it is long past time we return the right of personal self-defense to the people of Maryland,” he said. Ready noted that 42 states and Washington, D.C., are “shall issue” jurisdictions, meaning they permit concealed carry without requiring gun owners to show a special need, while 14 states do not require a permit to carry, wear, or transport a handgun. Justin Ready (R-Carroll), who has sponsored legislation in the past to make it easier for Marylanders to carry concealed weapons without needing to offer justification, said Thursday the Supreme Court ruling showed that Maryland has an “out-of-the mainstream statute restricting law-abiding citizens from possessing firearms.” The ruling from the Supreme Court clears the way for legal challenges to Maryland’s restrictions, and state policymakers may have to change their current law to be in accord with the Supreme Court ruling. The decision has the potential to make similar concealed carry laws unconstitutional in some states, including Maryland. “he Second and Fourteenth Amendments protect an individual’s right to carry a handgun for self-defense outside the home,” Thomas wrote. Bruen, Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas wrote that the court found that New York’s law requiring gun owners to demonstrate a need for self-defense in order to carry a firearm “is demanding.” In a 6-3 decision in New York State Rifle & Pistol Assoc. The opinion comes at the same time Congress is considering new gun control legislation following two deadly mass shootings. ![]() The court ruled that New York’s concealed carry law violates the 14th Amendment of the Constitution - a major decision that expands the Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms. Supreme Court on Thursday struck down a New York law that made it illegal to carry a firearm in public without showing a special need for protection - throwing into doubt the legal status of a similar Maryland law.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |